Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Roland Blaser's avatar

The myth of anonymity is simply not tenable. Of course, the owner of a wallet is somewhat less obvious than the owner of a bank account. But anonymity only works in theory, virtually in a vacuum. As long as you only consider the cryptocurrency on its own. However, both when using it as a currency and when entering it, there is always a flow of something in return. A consideration that is not anonymous and therefore also reveals the parties involved in the cryptocurrency flow. I am convinced that state actors (and other actors with sufficient computing power) have a fairly complete "who's who" of crypto wallets at their disposal. And the flow of money between wallets is nowhere as public and easy to trace as in a blockchain. There is zero anonymity and that is probably the more likely reason why cryptocurrencies are not yet banned.

I only agree with the assessment that cryptocurrencies can currently be helpful in overcoming the iron curtains between the multipolar blocks. (And may yet be banned for this reason).

Expand full comment
Zoran Pilipovic's avatar

Crypto depends on one thing only - electricity. No electricity no crypto and we are heading in that direction. The first victim of a new bigger war will be the electrical grid.

Expand full comment
18 more comments...

No posts