I'll savor this interview for later, but I've been a dedicated Larry Johnson-phile for a while and just recently added Aleks 'Black Mountain' to my short list of all-things UA. And it is short, even though I've been with it since 2014. I look forward to hearing more from both of you as this thing unfolds.
Apologies for the belated response. My key takeaway that it is scarily possible is that the West realizes that they hold a losing hand and then forcibly push the envelope beyond the borders of UA.. V. Nuland--who is alleged to have OK'ed the dam collapse-- takes over the #2 spot at State at the end of July--and will make the ineffectual Blinken look tame by comparison, will only push her agenda (supported by Biden) to some horrific conclusion.
Another great interview! 👏 With no disrespect to the other interviews, I learned the most from this one. All have been fantastic. Thank you for taking the time to share with us.
On the question: I recognized it and really appreciate you asking. I fully trust your judgment and endorse what you choose to do. "Grasshopper," looks very interesting too. Hope you're well.
Sergey Karaganov: By using its nuclear weapons, Russia could save humanity from a global catastrophe
A tough but necessary decision would likely force the West to back off, enabling an earlier end to the Ukraine crisis and preventing it from expanding to other states
Thanks for asking about US outposts camp Bondsteel. I'm left wondering with a clif high "prediction" of US personnel left high and dry at various US bases trying to get home. Years ago this may have seemed strange, but not so much now. No doubt in my mind the Empire of chaos is collapsing.
Two of the best💙🇷🇺❤️ And then your mesmerizing voice❤️🐈⬛Old lady with a cat who comes here to… be with the bright bulbs. Thanks so much, gentlemen !🐈⬛
However, we note that for several weeks the Americans have been regularly broadcasting “information”, or rather a “feeling” saying that the Russian nuclear weapons are for the most part (we have read the figure of 80%, taken from no one knows where) unusable because “poorly maintained”.
This in fact is done by Western leaders to persuade public opinion that if Russia is slow to lose the war, then they can safely hit her with nuclear weapons since she will hardly be able to retaliate, 80% of its weapons being “broken down” according to them.
A severe demonstration such as I described above will break this beautiful propaganda.
On the ground, the Ukrainians launch offensive after offensive, all being defeated by the Russian forces. But it would be irresponsible to think that the Ukrainians are coming to the end of their stocks: NATO has almost emptied its stocks of equipment and Ukraine is now over-armed with modern equipment.
Regarding military personnel, not all Ukrainians are dead yet, and many foreign mercenaries (including French, see this video of a Frenchman injured in Ukraine and evacuated. There are also a large number of Poles.
Once it has been understood that on the one hand Russia will go all the way with the demilitarization of Ukraine (that is to say up to Kiev at the very least), and that on the other hand the States- United (and therefore NATO) will not agree to let Russia win, we can consider several possible developments in the situation.
1- Russia continues to systematically destroy the Ukrainian offensives then launches in turn a general offensive in the direction of Odessa and kyiv. NATO realizes that it is unable to reverse the situation unless it intervenes directly, the Ukrainian regime “falls” and Ukraine passes under the direct control of Russia. The United States is preparing other attacks against Russia, as it has done for 20 years: internal destabilization, unrest in the Caucasus, etc. So we find ourselves like 10 years ago, without Ukraine as a forward base for NATO.
2- Russia continues to systematically destroy the Ukrainian offensives then launches in turn a general offensive in the direction of Odessa and kyiv. NATO, pushed by the American military lobby, then either uses tactical nuclear weapons on Ukrainian territory against Russian forces or sends its own troops there.
In both cases, Russia goes to war against NATO. If NATO used nuclear weapons, Russia is responding in the same way by hitting military bases in Poland, Romania Germany and France, to begin with. If NATO did not use nuclear weapons, Russia strikes European command centers, military AND political, using new generation weapons (Kinzhal, Poseidon, etc.)
It is then more than likely that the Ukrainian-Polish border will be nothing more than an unimportant line and the fighting will move to Poland and then to Western Europe. The European armies being on the one hand little motivated, on the other hand badly supplied (stocks of material are empty) it is likely that there will be very little resistance. We cannot imagine either England or France using nuclear weapons against Russia, knowing full well what awaits them in this case. Iran and Turkey for their part take advantage of the situation and enter southern Europe. Russia “from Brest to Vladivostok” is coming true…
The Americans will not intervene, even Biden and his manipulators will not risk their safety for Europe. They will introduce new sanctions! And Biden will likely no longer be in power.
3- Although this hypothesis is completely unthinkable, I mention it all the same for the principle: Russia is overwhelmed by the forces of Ukraine and a serious threat hangs over the security of the country, the Ukrainians take Kursk and Belgorod and advance on Moscow. As provided by Russian military doctrine, we are carrying out a warning nuclear strike in Ukraine, then possibly others if the Ukrainians do not leave Russia. Here too, NATO will not intervene more than today since no strikes have been carried out on countries of the Atlantic Alliance. Ukraine thus becomes a devastated “tampom zone” between NATO and Russia. The United States is preparing other attacks against Russia, as it has done for 20 years: internal destabilization, unrest in the Caucasus, etc.
Other parameters come into play: The situation in the United States where the risks of civil war are very real. Trump is in my opinion not a parameter to be taken into account, during his mandate he largely financed the Ukrainian army, bacteriological laboratories in Ukraine etc. A possible second Trump presidency will not change anything, but we can always envisage the election of a totally independent candidate, outside the system, who will then decide to end NATO aid to Ukraine. We are then in hypothesis number 1.
The internal situation in Russia can also play a role: Although Vladimir Putin is, whatever the Western media say, in perfect health, he can die. His replacement will very likely be a “hardliner” from the regime who will continue in the same direction even more energetically.
Although this assumption is completely stupid, I mention it all the same for the principle: A coup in Russia brings the “liberals” of the 5th column to the Kremlin. They order the withdrawal of Russian forces from Ukraine but the army refuses to obey. Civil war in Russia, NATO takes the opportunity to intervene militarily in Russia. This hypothesis, the least probable, would be the most favorable to Western countries.
These hypotheses are just … hypotheses, but Russian leaders are considering them and others. The only certainty today is that Russia will not abandon its objectives. His survival is at stake.
Excellent!
Hvala druze :)
I'm looking forward to read your next article ;)
I'll savor this interview for later, but I've been a dedicated Larry Johnson-phile for a while and just recently added Aleks 'Black Mountain' to my short list of all-things UA. And it is short, even though I've been with it since 2014. I look forward to hearing more from both of you as this thing unfolds.
Thanks. Looking forward to your comments about the interview, as soon as you have time to watch it.
Apologies for the belated response. My key takeaway that it is scarily possible is that the West realizes that they hold a losing hand and then forcibly push the envelope beyond the borders of UA.. V. Nuland--who is alleged to have OK'ed the dam collapse-- takes over the #2 spot at State at the end of July--and will make the ineffectual Blinken look tame by comparison, will only push her agenda (supported by Biden) to some horrific conclusion.
Well yes... that is bad.
Very bad.
But let's not doom to fast.
I keep an eye on that and perhaps, in time, I will write something about that topic.
Good Video Brother Man‼️
Thank you brother!
Another great interview! 👏 With no disrespect to the other interviews, I learned the most from this one. All have been fantastic. Thank you for taking the time to share with us.
Haha thanks :) But you already mentioned that you are "a fan" of Larry :)
I expected, you will like it ;)
Did you mention your committed question?
I was forced to alter it slightly because there had been many similar questions and I consolidated it slightly. I hope it is okay for you.
On the question: I recognized it and really appreciate you asking. I fully trust your judgment and endorse what you choose to do. "Grasshopper," looks very interesting too. Hope you're well.
Yes, where is he? I had his question as well :)
Thanks to putting trust in me TBP!
Watched on youtube. Thanks
Thanks Aleks!
Did anyone see this article on RT? June 14, 2023
Sergey Karaganov: By using its nuclear weapons, Russia could save humanity from a global catastrophe
A tough but necessary decision would likely force the West to back off, enabling an earlier end to the Ukraine crisis and preventing it from expanding to other states
https://www.rt.com/russia/578042-russia-nuclear-weapons/
Thanks for asking about US outposts camp Bondsteel. I'm left wondering with a clif high "prediction" of US personnel left high and dry at various US bases trying to get home. Years ago this may have seemed strange, but not so much now. No doubt in my mind the Empire of chaos is collapsing.
Thank you. If you didn't watch my interview with Mike Mihajlovic yet, I would recommend to do it. We discussed Camp Bondsteel as well.
https://bmanalysis.substack.com/p/interview-series-part-2
Two of the best💙🇷🇺❤️ And then your mesmerizing voice❤️🐈⬛Old lady with a cat who comes here to… be with the bright bulbs. Thanks so much, gentlemen !🐈⬛
Haha thank you very much :) I'm delighted!
By the way... I love cats!
WWIII: 3 scenarii
However, we note that for several weeks the Americans have been regularly broadcasting “information”, or rather a “feeling” saying that the Russian nuclear weapons are for the most part (we have read the figure of 80%, taken from no one knows where) unusable because “poorly maintained”.
This in fact is done by Western leaders to persuade public opinion that if Russia is slow to lose the war, then they can safely hit her with nuclear weapons since she will hardly be able to retaliate, 80% of its weapons being “broken down” according to them.
A severe demonstration such as I described above will break this beautiful propaganda.
On the ground, the Ukrainians launch offensive after offensive, all being defeated by the Russian forces. But it would be irresponsible to think that the Ukrainians are coming to the end of their stocks: NATO has almost emptied its stocks of equipment and Ukraine is now over-armed with modern equipment.
Regarding military personnel, not all Ukrainians are dead yet, and many foreign mercenaries (including French, see this video of a Frenchman injured in Ukraine and evacuated. There are also a large number of Poles.
https://boriskarpov.tvs24.ru/2023/06/18/3eme-guerre-mondiale-partie-3-evolution-du-conflit-russie-otan-3-scenari/
Once it has been understood that on the one hand Russia will go all the way with the demilitarization of Ukraine (that is to say up to Kiev at the very least), and that on the other hand the States- United (and therefore NATO) will not agree to let Russia win, we can consider several possible developments in the situation.
1- Russia continues to systematically destroy the Ukrainian offensives then launches in turn a general offensive in the direction of Odessa and kyiv. NATO realizes that it is unable to reverse the situation unless it intervenes directly, the Ukrainian regime “falls” and Ukraine passes under the direct control of Russia. The United States is preparing other attacks against Russia, as it has done for 20 years: internal destabilization, unrest in the Caucasus, etc. So we find ourselves like 10 years ago, without Ukraine as a forward base for NATO.
2- Russia continues to systematically destroy the Ukrainian offensives then launches in turn a general offensive in the direction of Odessa and kyiv. NATO, pushed by the American military lobby, then either uses tactical nuclear weapons on Ukrainian territory against Russian forces or sends its own troops there.
In both cases, Russia goes to war against NATO. If NATO used nuclear weapons, Russia is responding in the same way by hitting military bases in Poland, Romania Germany and France, to begin with. If NATO did not use nuclear weapons, Russia strikes European command centers, military AND political, using new generation weapons (Kinzhal, Poseidon, etc.)
It is then more than likely that the Ukrainian-Polish border will be nothing more than an unimportant line and the fighting will move to Poland and then to Western Europe. The European armies being on the one hand little motivated, on the other hand badly supplied (stocks of material are empty) it is likely that there will be very little resistance. We cannot imagine either England or France using nuclear weapons against Russia, knowing full well what awaits them in this case. Iran and Turkey for their part take advantage of the situation and enter southern Europe. Russia “from Brest to Vladivostok” is coming true…
The Americans will not intervene, even Biden and his manipulators will not risk their safety for Europe. They will introduce new sanctions! And Biden will likely no longer be in power.
3- Although this hypothesis is completely unthinkable, I mention it all the same for the principle: Russia is overwhelmed by the forces of Ukraine and a serious threat hangs over the security of the country, the Ukrainians take Kursk and Belgorod and advance on Moscow. As provided by Russian military doctrine, we are carrying out a warning nuclear strike in Ukraine, then possibly others if the Ukrainians do not leave Russia. Here too, NATO will not intervene more than today since no strikes have been carried out on countries of the Atlantic Alliance. Ukraine thus becomes a devastated “tampom zone” between NATO and Russia. The United States is preparing other attacks against Russia, as it has done for 20 years: internal destabilization, unrest in the Caucasus, etc.
Other parameters come into play: The situation in the United States where the risks of civil war are very real. Trump is in my opinion not a parameter to be taken into account, during his mandate he largely financed the Ukrainian army, bacteriological laboratories in Ukraine etc. A possible second Trump presidency will not change anything, but we can always envisage the election of a totally independent candidate, outside the system, who will then decide to end NATO aid to Ukraine. We are then in hypothesis number 1.
The internal situation in Russia can also play a role: Although Vladimir Putin is, whatever the Western media say, in perfect health, he can die. His replacement will very likely be a “hardliner” from the regime who will continue in the same direction even more energetically.
Although this assumption is completely stupid, I mention it all the same for the principle: A coup in Russia brings the “liberals” of the 5th column to the Kremlin. They order the withdrawal of Russian forces from Ukraine but the army refuses to obey. Civil war in Russia, NATO takes the opportunity to intervene militarily in Russia. This hypothesis, the least probable, would be the most favorable to Western countries.
These hypotheses are just … hypotheses, but Russian leaders are considering them and others. The only certainty today is that Russia will not abandon its objectives. His survival is at stake.