I have read the 'Saker' for years & it was via his website that I learned of your blog here at Substack. He was right in saying that BMA does a great job in informing & analysing. I have read your 8 major articles and have learned alot, each one of them has contributed to many 'aha' moments for me.
Please keep up the exceptional work.
I would not worry too much about your "written English" as the message gets through loud & clear.
Furthermore I would be willing to wager that your "written English" is orders of magnitude better than my written Serbian
You are doing very well.
Thank you for you contributions, comments, opinions & analysis.
Hvala brate. Nedostajace nam Saker ali srecan sam sto ima ko da nastavi sa kvalitetnim sadrzajem i okupljanjem kvalitetnih ljudi. Zelim ti svu srecu a skupicemo nesto i za kaficu :)
Брате, не знам ко си, али свака ти част. Хвала Сакеру што те је препоручио. Нигде нисам наишао на овако озбиљне и добре анализе. Едукација, информација и уживање у најчистијој форми. Жив био ти мени!!! Косово је Србија!!!
Check out The Duran News Aleks. Don't know if you've seen this, but Alex and Alexander have Attorney Robert Barnes on. The latter part of the video they get into geopoltical and economics.
I find your analyses very interesting and very accurate. I am looking forward to your next article, as I read through your other articles. I hope you will keep writing. The world needs people like you. BTW, I understand the problem with proofreading. When I write professionally (ie. for money) somebody else does it for me. On Substack, I don't have anybody but ME - and I am dyslexic.
Hi Aleks - just found your site yesterday 1.30.23 (The Saker) and just now finished reading all of your posts. Much gratitude for this body of work. I'll have to read much of it again since I'm still earning my training wheels. I have three areas I'm not clear about: 1) How the US will manage a multipolar world?, 2) Who is the third party you mentioned? I'm not certain I know. I have a difficult time sorting out the "elites" that moved from the UK to America (Introduction article) and seem to be parasites on the US political and financial system, to understand how they factor in going forward. 3) If the "scorched earth" worked for the West, and depletion of military capability worked for Russia? Where does that leave us going forward?
After seeing Raevsky’s recommendation a few days ago, I have read everything here, and your lucid analyses clarify a lot, particularly about the reasons behind Russia’s seemingly ineffective approach to the SMO. Your framework seems very good at grasping the essence of what is happening. I look forward to reading your new series and operational updates. It would also be interesting to hear more about the framework you apply to analyze geopolitical, economic, and military events. About which books/thinkers and sources have been the most important in shaping your unique perspective. And what main variables to keep an eye on to understand the greater geopolitical picture.
Greetings, and thank you for the great posts. I am one of the people reading your site at the suggestion of Mr. Raevski. An economic question, if I may: Is there any truth to the claim that economic ministers from Russia/BRICS say that if a country defaults on US (Western) debt, it would not be seen as a negative for joining BRICS?
I have also recommended your site on mine ("News Forensics") in my article comparing your analysis with Big Serge's. From my point of view, Big Serge is very good; your work is better.
I have read the 'Saker' for years & it was via his website that I learned of your blog here at Substack. He was right in saying that BMA does a great job in informing & analysing. I have read your 8 major articles and have learned alot, each one of them has contributed to many 'aha' moments for me.
Please keep up the exceptional work.
I would not worry too much about your "written English" as the message gets through loud & clear.
Furthermore I would be willing to wager that your "written English" is orders of magnitude better than my written Serbian
You are doing very well.
Thank you for you contributions, comments, opinions & analysis.
All the best to you.
Косово је Србија
Kosovo Is Serbia.
Thanks for your job.
Hvala brate. Nedostajace nam Saker ali srecan sam sto ima ko da nastavi sa kvalitetnim sadrzajem i okupljanjem kvalitetnih ljudi. Zelim ti svu srecu a skupicemo nesto i za kaficu :)
I just sent another message to The Duran on their Locals page recommending you for a live show. No response from them last time.
Брате, не знам ко си, али свака ти част. Хвала Сакеру што те је препоручио. Нигде нисам наишао на овако озбиљне и добре анализе. Едукација, информација и уживање у најчистијој форми. Жив био ти мени!!! Косово је Србија!!!
Check out The Duran News Aleks. Don't know if you've seen this, but Alex and Alexander have Attorney Robert Barnes on. The latter part of the video they get into geopoltical and economics.
https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/upost/3460576/live-w-the-duran
Србине, брате, једва чекамо твоје следеће писаније. Поздрав и жив био!
A mega thank you from Portugal (empire´s satrapy planted by the sea) for the great informative job you are doing. Please carry on. We need you.
I find your analyses very interesting and very accurate. I am looking forward to your next article, as I read through your other articles. I hope you will keep writing. The world needs people like you. BTW, I understand the problem with proofreading. When I write professionally (ie. for money) somebody else does it for me. On Substack, I don't have anybody but ME - and I am dyslexic.
Hi Aleks - just found your site yesterday 1.30.23 (The Saker) and just now finished reading all of your posts. Much gratitude for this body of work. I'll have to read much of it again since I'm still earning my training wheels. I have three areas I'm not clear about: 1) How the US will manage a multipolar world?, 2) Who is the third party you mentioned? I'm not certain I know. I have a difficult time sorting out the "elites" that moved from the UK to America (Introduction article) and seem to be parasites on the US political and financial system, to understand how they factor in going forward. 3) If the "scorched earth" worked for the West, and depletion of military capability worked for Russia? Where does that leave us going forward?
Thanks again, ~Carienn
After seeing Raevsky’s recommendation a few days ago, I have read everything here, and your lucid analyses clarify a lot, particularly about the reasons behind Russia’s seemingly ineffective approach to the SMO. Your framework seems very good at grasping the essence of what is happening. I look forward to reading your new series and operational updates. It would also be interesting to hear more about the framework you apply to analyze geopolitical, economic, and military events. About which books/thinkers and sources have been the most important in shaping your unique perspective. And what main variables to keep an eye on to understand the greater geopolitical picture.
Thank you for your great work!
Greetings, and thank you for the great posts. I am one of the people reading your site at the suggestion of Mr. Raevski. An economic question, if I may: Is there any truth to the claim that economic ministers from Russia/BRICS say that if a country defaults on US (Western) debt, it would not be seen as a negative for joining BRICS?
Oh, the article which deals with yours.
https://julianmacfarlane.substack.com/p/big-serges-big-surge
I have also recommended your site on mine ("News Forensics") in my article comparing your analysis with Big Serge's. From my point of view, Big Serge is very good; your work is better.
Great news Aleks. You deserve it all for your efforts.